Last Edited
You can subscribe to the Washington Post YouTube Fact Checker series of media literacy videos. This one covers the history of campaign ads, including the famous 1964 Daisy political ad that changed the industry forever and led the way for negative campaign ads. Students can view the entire "Peace, little girl" ad from the Library of Congress website: https://www.loc.gov/item/mbrs01185386/
3 - 5 9 - 12 Social Studies/History campaign advertising Daisy ad Fact Checker
'When it comes to campaign ads, there’s a lot to be wary of. Not only do they interrupt favorite TV shows, sneak into social feeds and infiltrate dinner conversations, but they can also be misleading or false. Campaign videos weren’t always part of presidential cycles.
When only nine percent of Americans had televisions in 1950, commercials weren’t a top priority for candidates. By 1960, that number exploded to nearly 90 percent. “The ads that were run are pretty primitive,” said Washington Post Chief Correspondent Dan Balz. “I mean they’re cartoonish, they’re jingles.” It wasn’t until a small girl picking daises in a 1964 ad for Lyndon B. Johnson did political advertising change, ushering in the era of negative campaign advertising. Today, there are a number of ways that campaign ads can use manipulated video — a recent Trump ad uses stock images over testimonials, giving the impression that the on-camera actors are real Trump supporters. So, while you’re watching campaign ads in the 2020 election cycle, keep these three things in mind.
1. Is there a possibility that a politician’s soundbite has been taken out of context and that it’s maybe not the full truth?
2. Ads are trying to convey a particular message. Does this one square with your general perception of the candidate? If not, do some research.
3. Check the source. Campaign ads make references to sources but some are more legitimate than others.
And, of course, let us know if we should look into a potentially misleading ad. Read more about how we classify manipulated video: https://wapo.st/manipulatedvideo. Subscribe to The Washington Post on YouTube: https://wapo.st/2QOdcqK
Follow us:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/washingtonpost
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/washingtonpost/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/washingtonpost/'
When only nine percent of Americans had televisions in 1950, commercials weren’t a top priority for candidates. By 1960, that number exploded to nearly 90 percent. “The ads that were run are pretty primitive,” said Washington Post Chief Correspondent Dan Balz. “I mean they’re cartoonish, they’re jingles.” It wasn’t until a small girl picking daises in a 1964 ad for Lyndon B. Johnson did political advertising change, ushering in the era of negative campaign advertising. Today, there are a number of ways that campaign ads can use manipulated video — a recent Trump ad uses stock images over testimonials, giving the impression that the on-camera actors are real Trump supporters. So, while you’re watching campaign ads in the 2020 election cycle, keep these three things in mind.
1. Is there a possibility that a politician’s soundbite has been taken out of context and that it’s maybe not the full truth?
2. Ads are trying to convey a particular message. Does this one square with your general perception of the candidate? If not, do some research.
3. Check the source. Campaign ads make references to sources but some are more legitimate than others.
And, of course, let us know if we should look into a potentially misleading ad. Read more about how we classify manipulated video: https://wapo.st/manipulatedvideo. Subscribe to The Washington Post on YouTube: https://wapo.st/2QOdcqK
Follow us:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/washingtonpost
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/washingtonpost/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/washingtonpost/'
Comments displayed by creation date
Replies displayed by creation date
Replies displayed by creation date
Perfect timing 
Mary Johnson
! I'm working on an online Media Literacy course for our teachers - thanks!
Check out this resource from the Washington Post. Seeing Isn't Believing. The Fact Checker's Guide to Manipulated Video
Testimonials
-
I love that there is new info on the site daily!
-
I had a wonderful time working with the Library of Congress and learning about all of the resources at my fingertips!
-
The TPS Teachers Network has an equal exchange of ideas. You know it's not a place where you're being judged.
-
My colleagues post incredibly fine resources and ideas....the caliber of the suggestions and resources make me feel that I take a lot from it. It's a takeaway. And I hope that I can give back as much as I get.
-
Going into this school year, I have a fantastic new resource for my own instruction and to share with my colleagues!
-
I am very glad that I discovered the TPS Teachers Network through RQI. Great resources can be hard to find out there on the internet!
