Welcome to the TPS Teachers Network, Roaring 20s Redux Participants! Choose one of the emerging themes and/or motifs from our site visit experiences thus far (Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History, The Rosenbach, walking tour of Architectural Philadelphia with Temple University Professor Emeritus John Pron) and provide commentary about (one) impactful piece that sparked your interest in the time period and, in particular, the arts of 1920s and why? Be sure to include image(s) to accompany your commentary. Be sure to visit LOC.gov and the museums' digital collections for reference. Consider the following:
1) How might this image/piece serve to illuminate your understanding of the time period under study?
2) What does this image/piece reveal about our society at the time?
3) When was this item created and for whom? Why might this image/piece be an important artifact to explore for further understanding?
6 - 8 9 - 12 Art/Music English/Language Arts Social Studies/History Bilingual Education/ESL
This comic strip from 1909 is on display at the Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History:
I’m struck by the comic’s overt anti-semitism and the contradiction it reveals in the thinking of a turn-of-the-century anti-semite. The first two panels could be used to support a modern interpretation of the displacement of Native Americans by European settlers; the Uncle Sam character is violently murdering the Native American character. But the remaining panels reveal a darker reality of the comic’s perspective: that the author is fearful of being “replaced” by Jews.
The fact that this comic was featured in a mainstream publication in 1909 reveals that anti-semetic views were mainstream and deemed acceptable by a large portion of American society. And that many people were afraid of having their jobs and resources “taken” by Jews (views which are the precursor to the Great Replacement Theory).
What I can’t wrap my head around is how this artist can portray the second half of the comic as negative and the first half of the comic as positive. From the artist’s perspective, Uncle Sam displacing Native Americans is a good thing, while Jews displacing Uncle Sam (and the white, non-Jewish Americans he represents here) is a bad thing. How can they hold both of these contradicting views?
That is such a powerful cartoon, and your "can't wrap my head around" statement really draws out deeper thinking, Tyler Mertens. I tried locating the cartoon, along with its link and bibliographic information, on the Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History website, but I wasn't able to find it. Do you happen to have a link for this artifact? (I'm also curious if the Library of Congress holds this publication anywhere in its collections.)
Margaret Lincoln, maybe you could help, too? This resource seems to merit a post in The American Jewish Experience group, even if it isn't located in the Library of Congress!
(In a little laugh-out-loud moment, immediately after I searched for the image at the Weitzman Museum, I got a sponsored image on Instagram of a t-shirt for purchase with "Secret Jewish Space Laser Corps" around the top of a circle and "Mazel Tough" at the bottom!)
I had trouble finding it online. The only way I could get to it was to use the virtual walk through of the museum on their website (https://nmajhtour.org/1880-1945/) and navigate to it there.
Here is the placard they have on display with it:
I'm sorry to have missed this interesting discussion earlier but appreciated the chance to explore the Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History including the valuable resources of the Museum's Peter H. Schweitzer Collection of Jewish Americana
The Digital Weitzman offers virtual tours and online exhibitions with the opportunity to view artifacts and stories and attend online events while delving more deeply into over 365 years of American Jewish history.
The Open Book Curriculum provides downloadable lessons for teaching American Jewish history using primary sources. Appendix B contains supplemental material on issues related to immigration and Antisemitism and references the image under discussion. Further comments can be found here.
I know from reading the post and the comments that the last images depict a Jewish person rejecting Uncle Sam. But, how would someone seeing this cartoon without context know that? Is it anything other than the stereotypical clothing? Please explain.
Such an interesting and engaging g post, Tyler! The fact that publications such as Life Magazine, with such a wide distribution and readership for the time, could serve as a platform for perpetuating these images and stereotypes is shocking buy not at all surprising. This would serve as a great springboard for discussion in a Media Literacy lesson or unit about messaging, propaganda, and persuasion.
I would disagree with your statement that they first half is seen as negative. It's 1909, just post-reservation period. America was still very much in its "manifest destiny" mindset. Native Americans were viewed as drunks and a drain on resources. Throughout the American West were signs that said "No Indians." This was true up until the 1970s.
So, I think the "negative" part of the cartoon are the last 2 panels where the US is fearful of being usurped by Jewish people.
The theme that has stood out to me in the first two days of class is the overall attitude of the Inter-War Period. This has stood out to me mostly because I have never thought about those years as interwar, but rather post-war and pre-war. The worry free feeling and an appreciation of the time we have on earth (especially after WWI and so many casualties) was most striking to me.
The attention to detail in art, music, architecture, etc. The taking of time on these extraneous detail in architecture that, according to John during our lecture, were not built to last. I connected with the feeling of living in the moment and making everything unnecessarily beautiful while we have it.
I also understand through our trips to the Weitzman National Museum of Jewish History, and the Rosenbach Museum that not all groups in this country were able to live the "glitzy American lifestyle". The focus on minority and marginalized groups through this class has been very eye-opening. I look forward to our trip on Wednesday.
The photos I have included from the LOC are examples of this attention to detail in architecture.
Jackie, I thoroughly appreciate this post and for the images you shared. They really show off the ornate beauty of the decorative arts used in architectural design at the time. And for your commentary suggesting that perhaps not all people of the time could fully relish in or enjoy the full scope of that "glitzy" period.
Chrysler Building is one of the best examples of art Deco building.
Yes, Juri, great point and image shared. A good take-away from the day.
Does this design bring to mind any of the building designs from the Philly walking tour? Can we connect the dots between the Chrysler building to any feature in the Philly skyline? (Could be a good visual exercise with students to introduce a lesson).
I really enjoyed the art deco architecture tour this morning with John Pron and I loved to see that so many details were preserved (though of course not all) on Philadelphia's historic 1920s and '30s buildings. These highly decorative mail boxes, lights, elevators and iron grates show that high society valued design in their buildings. Those who could afford it, showed it off. I took a photograph of the mailbox inside the Icon building at 1616 Walnut St. but was unable to include it here, so this is an image of the decorative iron grate. Today, the lights behind the iron work change color every few seconds, hopefully inspiring others to look up and admire its beauty.
Thanks for sharing this image and commentary, Colette. This could easily be a building that one would pass by wothout stopping and "seeing" how this facade is accentuated by the deco grate and changes of color. Many buildings in Center City Philly highlight this period in design - one just needs to "read the room," so to speak. That, and go on a guided Art Deco walking tour!
This image is titled "Protest against child labor in a labor parade" and was displayed in a section of the Weitzman Museum in a section about labor movements. The description on LOC states, "Photograph shows half-length portrait of two girls wearing banners with slogan "ABOLISH CH[ILD] SLAVERY!!" in English and Yiddish, one carrying American flag; spectators stand nearby. Probably taken during May 1, 1909 labor parade in New York City."
This piece deepens my understanding of the time on a few different levels. On the one hand, this shows that the exploitation of children as cheap labor was a part of the business model at the time. Children were a part of the work force often out of necessity, either to support themselves or to contribute financially to their family. In turn, this took many children out of school and a logical conclusion would be that this prevented them from further upward mobility in terms of financial and social status.
This image also demonstrates the fact that workers were beginning to protest and unionize in an effort to avoid exploitation, have safe working conditions, reasonable hours and fair compensation. Not only are these children who are protesting, but they are also girls--many of whom were factory workers in the garment industry. I found it interesting to see young girls asserting themselves for their rights so proudly.
Another aspect of this photo that I found interesting was that the sashes the girls are wearing are in both Yiddish and English. I interpret this as a sense of pride and identity. The placard at the Weitzman mentioned that,"Masses of "Jewish workers associated their political activism with their identity as Jews."
I would assume this item was created to be published in the newspaper in order to being about awareness of the labor movement and/or child labor movement. I would love to explore this image further to learn more about child labor, as well as the political activism of young women at the time.
Such a thoughtful and meaningful post, Lisa! I am thrilled that your experience at the Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History afforded a wealth of inspiration and visual impact for you. Your expressive post demonstrates how much of an empath you are and how you must be as a teacher for your students - for your ability to "unpack" and make connectionsn on a human level. Well done.
Both the Weitzman and Rosenbach museums were powerful experiences to partake in today and yesterday. The sources that sparked deeper interests from me were the rare book materials we reviewed at Rosenbach and the text excerpts that were reviewed and read, specifically the poem “Ode To Ethiopia” (1893) by Paul Laurence Dunbar and the excerpt from Langston Hughes’ Autobiography, “The Big Sea” (1968). There is something that immediately relates in the writing. Even though they are decades apart, the spirit of the 1920s is felt – the loud celebration of deep emotions is roaring! These writings celebrate “O Mother Race!” and celebrate themselves in ways they couldn’t before. There is an intellectual thread throughout the writings that we discussed and I was drawn to both pieces, especially the poem, because I read a lot of poetry books and this feels like a finale poem that is here at the start of the book kicking it off with bright fireworks instead. It’s a beautiful piece and it is a great lead into the 20s with directions to:
“Go on and up! Our souls and eyes
Shall follow thy continuous rise;
Our ears shall list thy story
From bards who from thy root shall spring,
And proudly tune their lyres to sing
Of Ethiopia’s glory.”
Hughes notes in his autobiography how when he was 21 in 1920, he also was celebrating becoming a man, “inside and out.” He continues, “You see, books had been happening to me. Now the books were cast off back there somewhere in the churn of spray and night behind the propeller. I was glad they were gone.”
These pieces from Dunbar and Hughes’ reveal the freedom that people are exploring in text and writing about, black people in particular, and they are asking for those readers to come along with them. Their portraits are attached above from the LOC.
An excellent and thought-provoking post, Renee! Similarly, I felt the same way when our group visited Harlem and stepped inside the lobby area at the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, a place where poet and writer, activitist and intellectual Langston Hughes' ashes remain interred. The fact that luminaries from around the world visit this site in Harlem as a "sacred" place to celebrate Black people's culture and heritage in America is a poignant reminder of the "power of place" - connected bodies and souls through hundreds of years of history. Well done!
At the Weitzman National Museum of Jewish History I was struck by the gown of Jean Gornish, which she wore when singing to secular audiences versions of religious and folk songs in the 1930s. Jean's father was a Philadelphia prayer leader but there was no way for her to follow in his footsteps because at that time women were not allowed to be cantors (singers during religious services) or even to sit near men at the synogogue.
Not to be prevented by this little difficulty, Jean gave herself the stage name Sheindele the Cantor, wore a gown very similar to that of a male cantor in a synagogue service (except it was white with gold thread) and performed the same religious songs to similar audiences on stage or the radio to great popular acclaim.
This satin gown and the woman who wore it underline for me the theme of denied access to a subgroup of the population. We learned from the 1924 US legislation that imposed quotas on immigration of people from South and Eastern Europe that Jews would be denied ease of immigration to the US, and Sheindele, and all women, are also denied access to leadership in the synogogue. Sheindele's youth and rebellion, like that we saw in the Art Deco culture so expertly described by John Pron in his Art Deco lecture, led her to the solution of performing on stage. Josh Perelman suggested that there is even an element of Drag dressing in Sheindele's persona, which is supported by her stage name and cross gender costume. If we use artifacts from the past to look to the future then this gown is important as it reveals hopes and dreams of one group to join and contribute to the work of another - and how well it can be done!
This is such a great post, Amy! I am struck by your comment: "If we use artifacts from the past to look to the future then this gown is important as it reveals hopes and dreams of one group to join and contribute to the work of another - and how well it can be done!" This is so true and really speaks to the heart of what Teaching with Primary Sources is all about - looking back to see further! I am also really intrigued at how fashion can provide a window into the past and reveal so much about societal shifts in values and norms. Well done!
A great post, Ann! Thoughtfully communicated. It is definitely very interesting to note that in one of America's largest cities (especially during the 1920s) that Philadelphia still maintained such a "muted" and provincial approach to design, unlike its more modernist contemporary to the north where iconic buildings like Chrysler, Empire State, and Rockefeller Center still dominate references to Art Deco design. However, Philly bows to no man or city! "No one likes us, No one likes us, No one likes us, We don't care!" A great album to accompany this post:
https://tpsteachersnetwork.org/the-arts-and-primary-sources/roaring-20s-redux